Catwoman (2004)

I’m always skeptical of movies that are directed by people with one name such as Pitof (Catwoman), McG (Charlie’s Angels), and Kaos (Ballistic: Ecks vs. Sever). I wasn’t expecting much from Catwoman (2004), especially after all of the bad press it received but to his credit, Pitof did a decent job.

There are some interesting CGI (computer genereated image) sequences and camera moves that give the film a unique style and feeling of high production value. This falls flat wherever there was any character animation—the CGI Catwoman jumping around the buildings in downtown Vancouver looked unrealistic and cartoon-like.

Halle Berry is a great choice for Catwoman. She insisted on doing most of her own stunts and it pays off. The fight scenes are actually pretty good and fairly realistic. Unfortunately a lot of her dialog is really cheesy, giving the movie a campy feel reminiscent of the 1960s Batman television series.

Sharon Stone was interesting as a villain, who I’ll call the Botox Brick. It made sense that the cosmetic products she used made her skin as like a body armor but where did she get her mad fightin’ skills?

The movie is far from perfect but I think it is worth a spin in your DVD player if you’ve never seen it. **

Films are rated from 1 to 4 stars.

Posted in DVD Reviews at 10:58 AM

Comments

Don’t you mean “…far from purrrrrrrrrrfect?!?”
I figured you’d like Catwoman for what it was… not what it wasn’t. What it is is an ideal $6.88 Walmart pickup. What it isn’t is at all remotely related to the Batman lore that spawned its name in the first place LOL. And what is it about the surname Phillips that makes for such wacky first names? Patience Phillips? China Phillips?? Stone Phillips??? Emo Philips???? Makes Halle Berry go together like John Doe.

Posted by: Eartha Kitt on December 5, 2006 3:06 AM

Post a comment




Remember Me? 

(you may use HTML tags for style)