Compact fluorescent light bulbs suck
I turn off my lights when I’m not using them. I turn my computer off instead of putting it too sleep. I turn off my power bars if I’m not going to be using them for a while. I try to be green, to a point.
I hate the compact fluorescent lamp (CFL) also known as the compact fluorescent light bulb. Yeah, I know it’s supposed to replace our old incandescent light bulbs but the light they emit is cold, sterile, ugly. Give me a halogen light any day. I don’t care how much energy they use, or waste.

The colour temperature in most CFLs is pretty lousy in my opinion. Until Philips or GE can make a CFL that produces a warm light that is comparable to incandescent lamps then I’m holding out. I don’t care if I can reduce greenhouse gases, I’m not switching.Compact fluorescent light bulbs suck.
If the province of Ontario follows through on their plan to ban the sale of incandescent light bulbs by 2012, well, I’ll just stock up on them like my friend Bill once did when Canadian Tire had a sale. I’ll purchase enough light bulbs until I go blind or die.
I’ll continue to recycle, conserve water by using rain barrels, upgrade my furnace, drive a small car, take public transit, use a push mower, but give up my halogen lights. Never.
Now I know how Charlton Heston feels about his guns.
Posted in Observations at 11:50 PM
Comments
You can pry the warm, soft glow from my cold, dead hands.
My complaint is the whole ‘CFLs last ten years’ line. My house is all CFL and I have had three die on me since I moved in 6 months ago; they weren’t ten years old.
Posted by: Ryan Glover on November 9, 2007 9:47 AM
Did it take some getting used to the different colour light all throughout the house?
CFLs are supposed to cost a lot more than regular bulbs and the claim is that you’ll make your money back because they last longer AND use less energy. I wonder how long they have to last before you ‘break even’.
At least you’re not using the extra hydro and harming the environment like some people we know.
Posted by: jay
on November 10, 2007 12:13 AM
I was listening to CBC radio once and an economist was breaking down the break even point for bulbs and he said it was a big smoke and mirrors show. His point was that bulbs would need to work for years, 5 or 7 or some such, before the savings would be seen. The issue is that you front load the cost, by buying the bulb, and you rely on time for the payoff. The problem is that the bulbs don’t last as long as advertised (what a surprise). They burn out because they are manufactured poorly, they break (knocking over a lamp, etc), they begin to flicker, etc. I just buy them because the quality of light doesn’t concern me much (see my next point) and it’s what you’re supposed to do.
When I moved into our new house all the lights were already CFL. I didn’t notice a difference because it was an all new place, so I had no conception of what traditional bulb light would look like in this house. Since I have never known what I’m missing, I don’t think about it.
Posted by: Ryan on November 10, 2007 8:54 PM
Yo, Jay… Whaddya mean ‘most CFLs is pretty lousy’?? I outta have Mike O’Shea knock your lights out!
Posted by: Michael (Pinball) Clemons on November 13, 2007 3:53 AM
I have had a couple of CFL bulbs since I lived in my one bedroom apartment, just after Pat and I got married. They made the move with us. They are the first ones that came out that required a separate, screw in ballast that the bulbs then plugged into. I have an 11 watt and a 13 watt in a couple of spots in the unfinished areas of the basement. They certainly don’t owe us anything, as they are over fifteen years old. One of them is usually on for hours per day, as it is in the area where the cat’s food dish is, and I don’t think she should have to eat in the dark. Still going strong.
I put new compact flourescents in the ceiling fixtures in our bedrooms, as those are just convenience lighting, and I don’t care what the light looks like. Sure, it’s a little bit cooler and dimmer than incandescents, but I figure taking out 120 watts, and putting 26 watts in their place has to be a significant savings. I am committed to replacing as many incadescents as I can over the next little while, as I am looking for some hydro savings.
Posted by: Paul on November 13, 2007 10:23 PM
Wow, that is impressive — 15-year-old light bulbs! I bet the person that designed those got fired.
Aside from CFLs I think that using power bars wherever you can is a good idea (and turning them off if you’re out for the day or away for a week).
Posted by: jay
on November 13, 2007 10:37 PM
I’ve heard the new ads about power bars with timers for equipment that presents a “phantom load.” My problem with that is the phantom load is there for a reason. For example, I wouldn’t want to come home to flashing twelve on my VCR every single day. Also, I don’t want my TV to take twenty minutes to warm up when I turn it on. I’m not convinced that the “phantom load” adds up to that much power usage anyway. Have you seen any stats on how much power these appliances “on standby” actually consume?
Posted by: Paul on November 14, 2007 12:02 PM
Its amazing what people TRY to do in the name of “saving the planet”, among other things, changing to sh*tty cfl’s (btw mercury for a strong heart right…), just look at the vast inefficiencies that exist beyond a few 60w standard light bulbs. There are many more ways to save energy, household light bulbs used for only a few hours per day will have a minimal overall effect (only saving a few dollars/month). I hate to say it but for the most part if your trying to save energy these bulbs are a waste of money, not to mention they simply don’t beat a standard light in terms of color and light output.
Does the ban of incandescent bulbs include halogens or just standard lights, I just cant see how the only type of bulb available for purchase will be a cfl. Many applications exist beyond a standard kitchen light that require other types of lighting (halogen flood lights and heat lamps for example).
Posted by: LivingItUp on December 4, 2007 10:35 PM
I was a big CF proponent - until I started using them. The lesser light quality and the long warm up time don’t bother me. I just can’t stand that CF manufactures put out such poor quality bulbs! In a 9-month time span, I replaced every single bulb in my kitchen (8 canned lights) except for one. The one I kept came with the house and lasted for 1.5 years after I moved in. EVERY SINGLE ONE of the CF bulbs I installed lasted less than 3 months. I got the bulbs from Lowes and Home Depot. I complained to both of them, but the response was, “No one has complained”. I thought it was poor quality electricity in the house, but my electrician says otherwise. He says that CF manufacturers are simply ripping off the consumer with poor quality bulbs. Has anyone else had this problem?
Posted by: gubbs on January 25, 2008 6:03 PM

